Login
A chronicle of the thoughts, learning experiences, ideas and actions of a tech junkie, .NET, JS and Mobile dev, aspiring entrepreneur, devout Christian and travel enthusiast.

There are a number of reasons why you would want to use a font other than the default one provided by the OS when developing mobile applications with Xamarin Forms. Whether it is for branding purposes or to simply add some pizzazz to the UI of the app, up until the release of Xamarin Forms 4.6, the process was tedious and contrived to say the least. With the release of version 4.6, the process has been simplified a lot.
For this walkthrough, I would be demonstrating how to use the simplified font embedding process using a common enough scenario. Adding in font icons from the popular Font Awesome pack. They provide quite the number of icons and they claim to be the "web's most popular icon set" and rightfully so if may add.
Font files come in a number of formats but as at the time of writing, I have been able to verify support for ttf (TrueType font) and otf (OpenType font) files. For our particular scenario, to get the font files, we head over to https://fontawesome.com/download and click on the "Free for Desktop" button. That downloads a .zip file to your computer.

Next, to access the font files, we need to extract the contents of the downloaded zip file. Locate the downloaded file and extract the contents using the tool of your choice. The extracted contents should look something like this:

If we drill deeper into the otfs folder, we should see content like this:

To add simplicity for later work, I renamed the files to make them easier to remember and work with. Font Awesome 5 Brands-Regular-400.otf became FA-Brands.otf. Font Awesome 5 Free-Regular-400.otf became FA-Regular.otf. Font Awesome 5 Free-Solid-900.otf became FA-Solid.otf. After all the renamings, my otfs folder now looks like this:

Before importing the font files into our projects, we need to create the necessary folder structure. In your shared PCL or NET Standard project, add a Resources folder and inside that, add a Fonts folder. After that, your folder structure should have something like this:

Import the newly downloaded and renamed .otf font files into the Fonts folder. NOTE: For each of the imported font files, ensure the Build Action is set as Embedded Resource. Your project should now look like this:

Next, we export our fonts. To do that, open your App.xaml.cs or your AssemblyInfo.cs file and above the namespace declaration, add the following:
[assembly: ExportFont("FA-Brands.otf", Alias = "FAB")]
[assembly: ExportFont("FA-Regular.otf", Alias = "FAR")]
[assembly: ExportFont("FA-Solid.otf", Alias = "FAS")]
I added aliases for all my exported fonts. This would make it easier to reference them in my XAML files. To display the artstattion font in my app, I grab the hex code from the font-awesome page

And then set up a Label to display the glyph as shown. NOTE: the glyph hex code has to be prefixed with a &#x and postfixed with a ; for it to be considered valid by Xamarin Forms.
<Label
Text=""
FontFamily="FAB"
HorizontalOptions="Center"
FontSize="50"
VerticalOptions="CenterAndExpand" />
Here is my final result.

I hope this was informative. Till the next one.
Cheers

Over my over 6 years in the software development space and specifically in the .NET ecosystem, I have noticed a kind of animosity towards Microsoft and the .NET platform. Companies create services and develop libraries for just about every other platform but .NET. The excuse cannot be lack of demand as C# is the 7th most used language and ASP.NET the 4th most used web framework by the Stack Overflow developer survey. Despite my ire with the current situation, I do not think it is wholly undeserved as Microsoft has acted in a similar manner over the years, though the organization under Satya Nadella has changed its approach to collaboration. Hopefully, things improve.
Firebase is a Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS) that started as a YC11 startup and grew up into a next-generation app-development platform on Google Cloud Platform. Arguably, the mostly widely used product in the Firebase suite is their real-time database. The Firebase Realtime Database is a cloud-hosted NoSQL database that lets you store and sync between your users in realtime. The Realtime Database is really just one big JSON object that the developers can manage in realtime.
For a mobile developer with little backend development skill or for a developer who is time-constrained in delivering a mobile product, Firebase takes away the need for building out a dedicated backend to power your mobile service. It handles authentication if you so desire and data persistence and for officially supported platforms, it even offers fail-safes for data if there is a network connectivity interruption. Sadly, .NET is not currently an officially supported platform. I remember seeing a petition or thread of some sort requesting official support from Google but can't seem to find it. Fortunately, we have a workaround. the fine folks over at step up labs wrote a wrapper around the Firebase REST API which gives us access to our data.
Now to the juicy bits, we need to install the libraries we need. To the shared .NET standard Xamarin project, run one of the following commands, depending on your preference:
Install-Package FirebaseDatabase.net
or
dotnet add package FirebaseDatabase.net
We need to create a model for the data we need to persist and modify. For that, we create a directory called Models. Next, we create a file Student.cs to hold our Student model as defined below:
public class Student
{
public string FullName {get; set;}
public string Age {get; set;}
}
The next step is CRUD (Create, Read, Update and Delete) for our data. In order to keep everything all tidy and such, we create a directory Services and a file StudentService.cs to hold our service logic. Remember, data in Firebase has to be stored as key-value pairs. To add support for persisting data to our service, we do the following:
using System;
using Firebase.Database;
using Firebase.Database.Query;
public class StudentService
{
private const string FirebaseDatabaseUrl = "https://XXXXXX.firebaseio.com/"; // XXXXXX should be replaced with your instance name
private readonly FirebaseClient firebaseClient;
public StudentService()
{
firebaseClient = new FirebaseClient(FirebaseDatabaseUrl);
}
public async Task AddStudent(Student student)
{
await firebaseClient
.Child("students")
.PostAsync(student);
}
}
To make use of our service, we add the following, it can be added to the code-behind files of views or in other services:
...
public StudentService service = new StudentService();
...
var student = new Student
{
FullName = "John Doe",
Age = "21 Years"
}
await service.AddStudent(student);
To retrieve the students we have saved to the database, we can add a new method to our StudentService class:
using System.Collections.Generic;
...
public class StudentService
{
...
public async Task<List<KeyValuePair<string, Student>>> GetStudents()
{
var students = await DatabaseClient
.Child("students")
.OnceAsync<Student>();
return students?
.Select(x => new KeyValuePair<string, Student>(x.Key, x.Object))
.ToList();
}
}
As you can observe with the data retrieval above, when we push new data to Firebase, a new Id is generated for the record and we can get that Id when we retrieve our data. The Id comes in useful when we need to update data we have on Firebase as shown below:
public class StudentService
{
...
public async Task UpdateStudent(string id, Student student)
{
var students = await DatabaseClient
.Child("students")
.Child(id)
.PutAsync(student);
}
}
Removing an entry is just as easy, we just need the id generated for the entry we need to remove. Update your StudentService class with a method to aid removal as shown below:
public class StudentService
{
...
public async Task RemoveStudent(string id)
{
var students = await DatabaseClient
.Child("students")
.Child(id)
.DeleteAsync();
}
}
The complete source for the samples shown can be found on GitHub. While I touched on the basics of accessing data from firebase, the FirebaseDatabase.net library offers support for more advanced data query options such as LimitToFirst and OrderByKey amongst others. It also offers data streaming similar to that of the official libraries with the System.Reactive.Linq namespace. You can find more in-depth documentation at the project GitHub page.
That's it for now,
Cheers.
In the early days of .NET Core, there was a reliable, built-in testing system but no code coverage tool to gain insight into the scope of testing being done. While the full .NET framework was spoilt for choice when it came to the selection of code coverage tools, from OpenCover to dotCover, there was little to nothing available for the nascent .NET Core.
Doing some research in those early days, it didn't seem like any of the established coverage tool developers were in a rush to add .NET Core support and who could blame them? There was no evidence this was not going to end up going the way of Silverlight, so I understand why they hedged their bets.
tonerdo along with some of the awesome .NET community created an open-source code coverage tool called Coverlet. This tool integrates itself into the msbuild system, instruments code and cam generate coverage in a number of supported formats.
To set your project up for coverage, in your test project folders i.e for each test project, run the following in your terminal:
dotnet add package coverlet.msbuild
dotnet add package Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk
With that, you are set to run tests and generate coverage.
If you are looking to generate coverage data for a single test project or generate separate coverage files for multiple tests, then following simple call would suffice. It generates coverage in JSON format and outputs a coverage file.
dotnet test /p:CollectCoverage=true
If you want to specify the output format, then an additional flag needs to be added. The formats supported currently are json, lcov, opencover, cobertura and teamcity. For example, to generate coverage in the opencover format, run the following:
dotnet test /p:CollectCoverage=true /p:CoverletOutputFormat=opencover
To generate coverage in multiple formats, separate the required formats by a comma (,). For example, to generate both lcov and json formats, we run the following:
dotnet test /p:CollectCoverage=true /p:CoverletOutputFormat=lcov,json
Further flags and options and documentation can be found at the project wiki here.
There may be a situation where you'd want to generate a single coverage file from multiple test projects, for example, reporting the coverage of an entire project instead of the component bits, then it gets a bit verbose but coverlet still covers (terrible pun, I know) us. For example, if I have three test projects, descriptively named Test1, Test2 and Test3 and I want to generate a single coverage file in the opencover format, then I have to run the following in sequence:
dotnet test Test1/Test1.csproj /p:CollectCoverage=true /p:CoverletOutput="./results/"
dotnet test Test2/Test2.csproj /p:CollectCoverage=true /p:CoverletOutput="./results/" /p:MergeWith="./results/coverage.json"
dotnet test Test3/Test3.csproj /p:CollectCoverage=true /p:CoverletOutput="./results/" /p:MergeWith="./results/coverage.json" /p:CoverletOutputFormat="opencover"
To explain what the above process does. First, we have to generate the coverage in the json form an only convert to our desired format (in this case lcov when we get to the last test project. Second, we need to have a specified folder where all the test reports get dumped so they can be combined, in this case out output folder is ./results. And finally as earlier mentioned, we specify our desired output format on the last test run ad that does the combining.
Hope this helps. Cheers.

We cannot and must not blame colonial powers and/or economic powers for our failings. We (Africans) have brought our countries and populace low. If we do not own up to that responsibility, we would always need aid from other nations. We can be better than we are, but we need to start thinking differently.
First off, since I am technically inclined, I understand the assumption that my content would be geared towards tech, but the purpose of this blog/site as is referenced in its name is to share "Winners Excogitations". To excogitate is to think out, therefore this platform is for me to share my thoughts, my ruminations and my experiences, so please bear through this well put together rant.
Second, there are a number of things which we can all as humans say are categorically evil. Chattel slavery and indeed slavery of any other sort was and still is evil. Corruption is evil. The holocaust was evil (even if you have doubts it happened, you can at least say it would be evil if it happened, right? right??? Cool). And I also think we can all agree that the treatment of indigenous peoples under colonial powers could also be categorized as evil. Now all caveats are on the table...
I feel the need to explain why this treatise is necessary. As a black (are there any other types?) Nigerian, living in Nigeria and interacting with fellow Nigerians, a general underlying if not overt sentiment I have identified when we discuss the economic/social/political challenges we face is that the British colonial government is somewhat to blame for the challenge. I believe this sentiment is an excuse and a cop-out, it is a go-to when we do not want to introspect and ask ourselves hard questions. I would in the course of this article, outline some assertions borne out of the underlying sentiment earlier mentioned and point to the reason why the assertion is faulty or plain false.
Western Europeans took our people as slaves: If we take a few minutes to perform a perfunctory search for the transatlantic slave trade_ it is immediately evident that a very large portion of the Africans sold into slavery were sold off by Kings, Chiefs and Warlords who were themselves Africans. While I cannot say what would have happened if our people chose not to sell their compatriots into slavery, one thing we have to understand is that as history stands, we were as complicit in the slave trade as any West European trader or American buyer.
Had it not been for colonialism, we would have been as advanced as western societies: As assertion like this is easy to prove or disprove. In Africa, there are two countries who have arguably never been colonized; Liberia and Ethiopia. If colonialism was the poison that destroyed our innovation and development, then Ethiopia and Liberia would be far ahead of the pack, yet that is not the case. The top 10 richest African countries by nominal GDP and the top 10 richest African countries by per capita GDP were all colonized by western European countries. This is not to say that being a former colonial state is an indicator of wealth as there are states that were colonised but are still poor. The point here is that there is no evidence we would have done better if we weren't colonized.
If countries were of the same language and/or religions, they'd do so much better: I'll admit that I not only believed this assertion in time past but also espoused it. It was only after reading Lee Kwam Yew's book "From Third World to First" that I saw the flaws in this assertion. To disprove this assertion, I would take Singapore as a case study, the country is made up of Ethnic Malayans, Ethnic Han Chinese and Ethnic Indians. The religious distribution across the population includes Catholics, Protestants, Muslims and Hindus. While this is not as diverse as some African countries, I'd argue is diverse enough for an argument. Despite ethnic and divisions, the Singaporeans, with the oft-understated benefit of great, visionary leaders and for the survival of their nation, devised systems that fostered religious and ethnic tolerance and economic prosperity. I'd even go so far as to say that if a mythical African country with the same language, culture and religion was created, it would still do as poorly as most African countries currently do.
The westerners brought "their" religions as a tool to subjugate us: There are so many things wrong with this assertions. First, Westerners only brought Christianity to Africa, there are a very significant number of Muslims in Africa and they were not proselyted by Westerners. Second, Christianity and Islam are not Western in any way seeing as they originated in the Middle East. Finally, if religion was to put us down, then why are the countries who preached the religions to us doing quite well themselves? or were we taught an off-brand version of the religion?
Western countries steal our resources: As far as I know a lot of raw material exploration in Africa is carried out by foreign entities. That said, we live in a world of free enterprise, if there were indigenous companies that could explore with the same or better levels of professionalism at competitive prices, I don't see why they would not be given contracts. remember that our own people are in charge of awarding licenses and contracts so the fault still lies with us. Whatever resource is being "stolen", be it crude oil, coal, cobalt, gold or diamonds, remember we are complicit in their loss.
There is so much more I want to say, I didn't even get to the story of Botswana but I'll leave off with this. It is way way easier to blame someone or something for the state of our nations rather than telling ourselves the truth that we have failed. If we are to make progress for ourselves and for our posterity, if we are to change the perception of Africa as a continent of poor countries and people that consistently need help, if we are to prove to the world and to ourselves that we are more that we have demonstrated thus far then we cannot continue to absolve ourselves of guilt and place the blame of our failures on colonial powers, on imperialist powers and any other thing we can point to. WE and we alone are responsible for failing to provide electricity and other infrastructure for our people, for failing to properly educate our populace, for failing to create enabling environments for business development, for failing to stem corruption. We have terribly laid this bed, but nothing is stopping us from relaying it.
If there are any other assertions that you feel I should address, let me know in the comments and I would create a sequel or update this one.
A URL Shortener as Rebrandly would out it is "a simple tool that takes a long URL and turns it into whatever URL you would like it to be". And that is all there is to it. A URL Shortener takes a URL, usually, a long one and converts it into a shorter URL.
Using a URL shortener comes with a number of advantages:
The aim of this article is to demonstrate interfacing with MongoDB using the first party Mongo client library as well as optimizations we can add to boost the performance of our application.
Technologies
If the title of the article was not a dead giveaway, we would be employing the following technologies:
Prerequisites
To adequately follow this guide, you would need two things installed and running on your local machine
First, we create our application folder by running
mkdir url-shortener
Next, we change directories by running
cd url-shortener
Next, we create a new ASP.NET Core project
dotnet new mvc
The line above creates a new MVC project. You can choose to use classic Razor pages or any other SPA framework offered by the CLI. To see the scaffolded app in action, you can run
dotnet run
if everything works as expected, your application should be running on http://localhost:5000 and if you visit the url you should see

At this point, you can open the project up in your favourite code editor or Integrated Development Environment. For some, it is VSCode, Visual Studio, Sublime Text, or Atom (I don't judge). For me, the IDE of choice is JetBrains Rider.
You should have a folder structure similar to that shown below

Next, we install the packages we need to get our service up and running
dotnet add package MongoDb.Driver
dotnet add package shortid
Next, we want to create our data model. First off create a directory named Models and a class file named ShortenedUrl.cs and add the following details
using MongoDB.Bson;
using MongoDB.Bson.Serialization.Attributes;
public class ShortenedUrl
{
[BsonId]
public ObjectId Id { get; set; }
public string OriginalUrl { get; set; }
public string ShortCode { get; set; }
public string ShortUrl { get; set; }
public DateTime CreatedAt { get; set; }
}
Next, we set up Mongo database in our controller. In the HomeController add the following
using MongoDB.Driver;
...
public class HomeController: Controller
{
private readonly IMongoDatabase mongoDatabase;
private const string ServiceUrl = "http://localhost:5000";
public HomeController()
{
var connectionString = "mongodb://localhost:27017/";
var mongoClient = new MongoClient(connectionString);
mongoDatabase = mongoClient.GetDatabase("url-shortener");
}
}
In the case above, url-shortener is the database name given and it can be changed to anything else. The next step for us is to create a controller method that would take in the long url and generate a short URL. This particular method checks the database first and then if the url has not been shortened before then we shorten and generate a URL.
using MongoDB.Driver.Linq;
using shortid;
using url_shortener.Models;
...
public class HomeController : Controller
{
...
[HttpPost]
public async Task<IActionResult> ShortenUrl(string longUrl)
{
// get shortened url collection
var shortenedUrlCollection = _mongoDatabase.GetCollection<ShortenedUrl>("shortened-urls");
// first check if we have the url stored
var shortenedUrl = await shortenedUrlCollection
.AsQueryable()
.FirstOrDefaultAsync(x => x.OriginalUrl == longUrl);
// if the long url has not been shortened
if (shortenedUrl == null)
{
var shortCode = ShortId.Generate(length: 8);
shortenedUrl = new ShortenedUrl
{
CreatedAt = DateTime.UtcNow,
OriginalUrl = longUrl,
ShortCode = shortCode,
ShortUrl = $"{ServiceUrl}/{shortCode}"
};
// add to database
await shortenedUrlCollection.InsertOneAsync(shortenedUrl);
}
return View(shortenedUrl);
}
}
Next, we have to support redirecting to long URLs when the short URL link is entered into the address bar. And for that, we add an override to the default Index route that supports having a short code. The implementation for that controller endpoint is as follows
[HttpGet]
public async Task<IActionResult> Index(string u)
{
// get shortened url collection
var shortenedUrlCollection = _mongoDatabase.GetCollection<ShortenedUrl>("shortened-urls");
// first check if we have the short code
var shortenedUrl = await shortenedUrlCollection
.AsQueryable()
.FirstOrDefaultAsync(x => x.ShortCode == u);
// if the short code does not exist, send back to home page
if (shortenedUrl == null)
{
return View();
}
return Redirect(shortenedUrl.OriginalUrl);
}
Setting Up The Client Side
To receive the long url, we need to add an input control and a button to send the data to the server-side from. The home page is implemented as follows
@{
ViewData["Title"] = "Home Page";
}
<div class="text-center">
<h1 class="display-4">Welcome</h1>
<p>A url shortener built with ASP.NET Core and Mongo DB</p>
</div>
<div style="width: 100%; margin-top: 60px;">
<div style="width: 65%; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
<form id="form" style="text-align: center;" asp-action="ShortenUrl" method="post">
<input
type="text"
placeholder="Enter Url ..."
style="width: 100%; border-radius: 5px; height: 45px;"
name="longUrl"/>
<button
style="background-color: darkgreen; color: white; padding: 10px; margin-top: 25px; border-radius: 8px;"
type="submit">
Shorten Url
</button>
</form>
</div>
</div>

To show the generated URL, we need a new view named ShortenUrl.cshtml with the following content under the Views directory
@model ShortenedUrl;
@{
ViewData["Title"] = "Shortened Url";
}
<div style="width: 100%; padding: 30px;">
<div>
<div>Short Code: @Model.ShortCode</div>
<div>Short Url: @Model.ShortUrl</div>
<div>Long Url: @Model.OriginalUrl</div>
</div>
</div>
A sample URL generated response would look like

The entire source code for this article can be found here. In a follow-up article, we would benchmark the current implementation and take steps to improve performance.
Till the next one,
Adios